ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality
Site
Text
Media
Games
About
|
Contact
|
Guide
|
Filters
Users
|
Preferences
|
Search
|
FAQ
News
|
Forums
|
Columns
Journals
|
Articles
|
Polls
|
Wiki
Files
|
Galleries
|
Demos
Events
|
Coverage
|
Movies
ESR Shop
|
Betting Fixtures
Not Logged In
|
Login
|
Register
04:04 CST -
2270 users online
ESR Discord Channel
Live Streams
no live streams found
Scheduled Listings
more...
Latest Threads
Latest Comments
News
250FPS League Season 4
(12)
News
Frazer "Fraze" Hockley has passed away
(60)
News
Reflections with Makaveli: Changing my narrative
(21)
Poll
Which comeback would you rather see?
(333)
News
Quake 3... in a browser!
(2)
more...
Latest Forum Threads
GG
The Finals
(3)
GG
Total Chaos
(5)
GG
Global Combat
(21)
Q3
wmo question
(5)
GG
Boomer Shooters are booming
(205)
more...
Latest Journals
Some (old) thoughts on QL
(137) by czm
You probably do not understand
(14) by stpbozin
Makaveli Historical Archive and Articles
(12) by D16-makaveli
we meat again
(1162) by aggnog
CPMA huds
(9) by ger1e
more...
Hot Topics
more...
ESR Virtual Betting
Lamur
E$ 238,131
E$ 176,304
omek
E$ 129,238
fazz
E$ 61,723
lithz
E$ 58,635
nsx0r
E$ 57,658
nk121
Betting Leaderboard
Open Betting Fixtures
All Posts
TFT with 2ms good enough for quake?
(
10 comments
)
( Forum: HW)
Posted by
shqdow
@ 11:21 CDT, 4 May 2009 -
iMsg
Is a response time of 2ms enough for a tft to play quake with the same (almost) feeling as on crt?
i once tried a tft with 5ms and thought it was unplayable - in comparison to my ancient crt.
any thoughts on this?
3384 Hits
Next Page
>>
Conceived and created by
Sujoy Roy
(
Legal Notices
)
RSS Feed Information
,
Link Buttons and Banners